<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: using the catalog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225</link>
	<description>Laura Crossett on the LIS domain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:07:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225/comment-page-1#comment-65437</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=225#comment-65437</guid>
		<description>I agree; the catalog is an essential good. Just because it hasn&#039;t made as much progress as it should doesn&#039;t mean we should (or can) throw it out.

I&#039;ve been hearing of a few libraries abandoning classification schemes, and just grouping subjects together intuitively. The catalog becomes less useful then. With a Dewey Decimal code + author&#039;s last name you can go right to the book on the shelf after looking it up, but if there&#039;s no organization you can&#039;t. Even shelving the books by barcode number is better than nothing, though no one does that because it would make you completely dependent on computers to find anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; the catalog is an essential good. Just because it hasn&#8217;t made as much progress as it should doesn&#8217;t mean we should (or can) throw it out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been hearing of a few libraries abandoning classification schemes, and just grouping subjects together intuitively. The catalog becomes less useful then. With a Dewey Decimal code + author&#8217;s last name you can go right to the book on the shelf after looking it up, but if there&#8217;s no organization you can&#8217;t. Even shelving the books by barcode number is better than nothing, though no one does that because it would make you completely dependent on computers to find anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225/comment-page-1#comment-64887</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=225#comment-64887</guid>
		<description>Oh my God,
What now? Who now? WHO doesn&#039;t use the catalog? (I&#039;m saying that like on Seinfeld: &quot;Who doesn&#039;t want to wear the ribbon?!?!?)

I LOVE my library catalog. Sure it&#039;s clunky but it sure gets the job done. I order what I want, I check out an author&#039;s work, I use their monthly &quot;new in the catalog&quot; lists, even now and then I browse (and request!) weird titles that just happen to sort around a title that I&#039;m searching for.

And, p.s., Amazon blows for that sort of thing. And I hate their new feature with the related titles and the weird arrows that let you scroll from side to side--it takes twice as long to load the page as it used to. Bleah. That&#039;s too much technological advancement, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God,<br />
What now? Who now? WHO doesn&#8217;t use the catalog? (I&#8217;m saying that like on Seinfeld: &#8220;Who doesn&#8217;t want to wear the ribbon?!?!?)</p>
<p>I LOVE my library catalog. Sure it&#8217;s clunky but it sure gets the job done. I order what I want, I check out an author&#8217;s work, I use their monthly &#8220;new in the catalog&#8221; lists, even now and then I browse (and request!) weird titles that just happen to sort around a title that I&#8217;m searching for.</p>
<p>And, p.s., Amazon blows for that sort of thing. And I hate their new feature with the related titles and the weird arrows that let you scroll from side to side&#8211;it takes twice as long to load the page as it used to. Bleah. That&#8217;s too much technological advancement, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaijsa</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225/comment-page-1#comment-64550</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaijsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=225#comment-64550</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. I know I&#039;m at an academic library, so lots of our students and faculty are searching for subjects rather than known items or authors, but I really see the catalog love from our many public patrons. They also want to see what we have on a topic or by a particular author, and they really don&#039;t want to wander our six floors of stacks to do it. 

What we really need is a catalog that provides a good user experience with little to no learning curve. I&#039;d embrace that sucker with open arms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. I know I&#8217;m at an academic library, so lots of our students and faculty are searching for subjects rather than known items or authors, but I really see the catalog love from our many public patrons. They also want to see what we have on a topic or by a particular author, and they really don&#8217;t want to wander our six floors of stacks to do it. </p>
<p>What we really need is a catalog that provides a good user experience with little to no learning curve. I&#8217;d embrace that sucker with open arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: your mom</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/225/comment-page-1#comment-64549</link>
		<dc:creator>your mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=225#comment-64549</guid>
		<description>yes--and I miss the old card catalogues, where a whole lot of stuff would be in the same drawer (or 3, if you were doing a Shakespeare term paper). And the random interesting things you could come across just because they were next to Shakespeare. Can&#039;t do that on-line. Of course, I actually had to go to the library to use it, but I forced myself once or twice a semester. love from your mom, also a literature geek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes&#8211;and I miss the old card catalogues, where a whole lot of stuff would be in the same drawer (or 3, if you were doing a Shakespeare term paper). And the random interesting things you could come across just because they were next to Shakespeare. Can&#8217;t do that on-line. Of course, I actually had to go to the library to use it, but I forced myself once or twice a semester. love from your mom, also a literature geek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

