<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: index this!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/86/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/86</link>
	<description>Laura Crossett on the LIS domain</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/86#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=86#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Ooh--A9 + books--must remember that for future such inquiries. There's more to tell about Mr. Castle, but we won't ruin it for the other readers.

The C&#38;I index seemed as though it would be useful, but I suppose the real test comes when I actually want to find something, rather than when I'm just looking through it idly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh&#8211;A9 + books&#8211;must remember that for future such inquiries. There&#8217;s more to tell about Mr. Castle, but we won&#8217;t ruin it for the other readers.</p>
<p>The C&amp;I index seemed as though it would be useful, but I suppose the real test comes when I actually want to find something, rather than when I&#8217;m just looking through it idly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/86#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=86#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I've been using the A9 search engine with the "books" box checked for that sort of thing. "Cat's Cradle Index" got me a link to a page in Amazon's "Search Inside the Book" feature. And I learned that Philip Castle was self-indulgent.

Thanks! Fun post. I usually use on-line dictionaries or a little dictionary I have on my computer, but I always pull the physical Roget's Thesaurus off the shelf when I want to really explore words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using the A9 search engine with the &#8220;books&#8221; box checked for that sort of thing. &#8220;Cat&#8217;s Cradle Index&#8221; got me a link to a page in Amazon&#8217;s &#8220;Search Inside the Book&#8221; feature. And I learned that Philip Castle was self-indulgent.</p>
<p>Thanks! Fun post. I usually use on-line dictionaries or a little dictionary I have on my computer, but I always pull the physical Roget&#8217;s Thesaurus off the shelf when I want to really explore words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/86#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newrambler.net/lisdom/?p=86#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. The index to C&#38;I is a pretty good example of why indexing your own book isn't a hot idea; it's a mediocre index, but the best I could justify doing. (In other words, laziness and lack of professional indexing skills...)

I've indexed two or three of the books I've published (it's expensive to have a pro do it). The newest, &lt;I&gt;First have something to say&lt;/I&gt;, was professionally indexed ($ouch). I suspect the difference in quality is apparent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. The index to C&amp;I is a pretty good example of why indexing your own book isn&#8217;t a hot idea; it&#8217;s a mediocre index, but the best I could justify doing. (In other words, laziness and lack of professional indexing skills&#8230;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve indexed two or three of the books I&#8217;ve published (it&#8217;s expensive to have a pro do it). The newest, <i>First have something to say</i>, was professionally indexed ($ouch). I suspect the difference in quality is apparent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
